Should Republicans charged with a DUI/DWI be allowed to own/get guns?

It is quite obvious a drunk with a gun is as dangerous as a drunk with a car. And since most registered Republicans support the war and the right to own guns, I think we can connect the dots. At least most of us non-Fox News people.
Answer:
It depends on laws concerning dui and the ownership of a gun. If the dui results in commitment to a treatment facility'then I do not think they should be able to own a gun due to unstable mental health

---

No, what has one got to do with the other?
is not it enough to lose your driver's license and pay a high insurance rate?

well, to each his own

---

This question is so ludicrous,I can't even rise up to bash you

---

lets just have a day where drunks can drive drunk, and another when drunks can walk down the street with guns, this should eentualy eliminate the problem while keeping inocent people safe.

---

I am curious, why didn't you do this for everyone? Why just the Republicans?
Honestly, I believe that DUI/DWI should be equal across the board with license forfeiture, since licenses are not a right, but a privilege.
Firearm ownership is not a privilege, it is a right and therefore not subject to the same rules. But, that being said, all of our rights also carry responsibilities and they are not divorced from each other.
The 1st amendment is not without it's responsibilities, and neither is the 2nd. By exorcising these rights we agree to engage in these in a responsible and respectful manner.

---

I sure can't connect your dots in any logical manner to even understand what the question is. Too much Brit Hume, I guess.