Should the death penalty be gone?

yes or no
Answer:
no we should kill dumb people

---

Yes.

---

no.

---

Yes

---

no if it can be proven beyond a doubt , then so be it

---

no

---

If anything it needs to be accelerated. Execution should come in a matter of weeks, not years. Execute the garbage and clean the trash out of society.

---

No

---

in most cases, but when you're dealing with psychos like the Columbine murderers, 9-11 terrorists, and Virginia Tech murderer, they should get it. The last thing we need is one of those psychos escaping from jail.

---

Yes...the state has no business killing it's citizens. The reason is that every time we execute a person that's innocent it makes a murderer out of every tax payer and I do not want murder carried out in my name.

---

No. It shouldnt be, but then I think that the laws of the Old west should be brought back.
If punishment was actually handed out rather than a slap on the hand, then crime would go down.
Seriously dont you think that if the next criminal had to face his victim who carried and gun, used it and could harm him, dont you think he would think twice about commiting crime?
I'm not sayin that the old west was without its fair share of crime, criminals and the like. It wasnt by any means.
But if the same laws then applied now, our crime rate would go down. Its amazing that in the country were there is the most laws, we have the greatest of injustices.

---

NO! In fact, we should put in an "Express lane" for people convicted of murder where there is no doubt of guilt!

No reason to suspect that the shooting was justified.

No reason to doubt the "chain of evidence", as in under police surveillance from committing the crime to arrest, or positive DNA evidence linking the killer to the crime.

Upon being found guilty under these circumstances, the killer should have 2 years, and only 2 years to disprove the prosecution's case.

Can't do it? FRY, baby, FRY!!!!