Should the Bill of Rights be amended to include the following?

NEW PREAMBLE TO THE CONSTITUTION

This is probably the best e-mail I've seen in a long, long time. The following has been attributed to State Representative Mitchell Kaye from GA. This guy should run for President one day...

"We the sensible people of the United States, in an attempt to help everyone get along, restore some semblance of justice, avoid more riots, keep our nation safe, promote positive behavior, and secure the blessings of debt-free liberty to ourselves and our great-great-great-grandchildre... hereby try one more time to ordain and establish some common sense guidelines for the terminally whiny, guilt ridden, delusional, and other liberal bed-wetters. We hold these truths to be self evident: that a whole lot of people are confused by the Bill of Rights and are so dim they require a Bill of NON-Rights."
Answer:
will watch for his running....thanks

---

No. By the way, The Bill of Rights is not the actual Constitution itself. It is the first 10 amendments to the Constitution. I suggest you do some more research.....

---

Technically the United States has no official or state sponsored language.....

---

What is wrong with the current bill of rights????
if the Govt would just follow the COTUS we would have no problems.

---

Um, the "In God We Trust" and "One Nation Under God" crap was added to American currency and to the Pledge of Allegiance in the 1950s during the Cold War because the Soviet Union was officially atheist. Take your rightwing Jesus freak Republican agenda and shove it.